We are approached by a
man. Dressed slickly in his black and white attire, he adopts a forthright
persistence, eager to move us along and out of his neighborhood. Tzitzit hang
loosely from underneath his clothing, complimenting a “black hat” complacently
settled on his head. The gentleman is uncomfortable with our appearance and
questioning curiosity. In this ultra-orthodox neighborhood, Meah Shearim,
the sight of our toes and uncovered hair is
immodest. Little girls peer at us from behind barred balconies and a little boy
runs by, covering his eyes in order to avoid looking at the semi-modestly
dressed girls.
Meah Shearim, while
located in the heart of Jerusalem, starkly contrasts more secular areas in
Israel such as Tel-Aviv. For me, this neighborhood highlighted the large range
of ethnicities and religiosities within Israel. In class, we have quickly begun
to delve into these varying demographics. We have focused on both the hardships
and racism faced by Ethiopian and Russian Jews, discussed in chapter eight of The Israelis and an in in-class
documentary, Russian Israelis. Along
with this, in our discussion of Zionism and the State of Israel, we began to discuss
the Israeli and Palestinian conflict. As we began our tour of Meah Shearim, we
approached a road sign containing three languages. The middle language, Arabic,
had been harshly blackened out. In a country containing so many viewpoints,
ideologies and opinions, it becomes clear how difficult it is to appease all
populations in an effort to create peace both domestically and internationally.
These varying
demographics also contribute largely to a broad range of political ideologies. The
Israeli Right, as seen by Robert O. Freedman, while once credited for the want
of an “exclusive Jewish dominion on both sides of the Jordan River,” is
characterized by “carrying out the Zionist dream to its extreme.” The Israeli
Left, represented by parties such as the Labor Party and Meretz, starkly
contrast the Israeli Right by focusing on a template for Israeli-Palestinian
peace and a two-state solution. Many other parties fall in-between these two
extremes. While we have just begun to discuss the Israeli government, political
ideologies and Israeli-Palestinian conflict in class, it has already become
obvious that there is an inherent need for a pragmatic compromise. Yet,
political figures struggle to negotiate due to varying beliefs both within Israel
and internationally.
In the tour of the Old
City, our tour guide Danny Herman, highlighted that conflicting interests have
permeated Israel’s past for centuries. He continually used the word “balagan”
(Hebrew for mess), to characterize the continuous conflicting situations.
Today, the word balagan continues to remain relevant. Meah Shearim, along with
other readings and tours, have highlighted the complex and conflicting nature
of both Israeli society and politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment